About Me

Name: Garnet92
Location: Plano, TX
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Want to know more about Rick Perry?

Though I've been a long time blogger here on Townhall (since 2008), I can no longer abide the bug-ridden editor and have moved to WordPress. My new works are only being updated on WP so if you want to see the latest on Rick Perry, you'll have to go there.
 
Here is a link to Pesky Truth at WordPress: http://peskytruth.wordpress.com/
 
I do honestly appreciate those who used to frequent Pesky Truth here on TH and I hope that you'll visit us at WP soon.
Thanks,
G92
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Hoggtown Tattler (Redneck Satire)

Since the TownHall editor stymied my every attempt to post the Tattler here, I've moved it to WordPress.
 
Click here for the Hoggtown Tattler;  http://peskytruth.wordpress.com/
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Coming to Their Senses?

There is a glimmer of hope, indeed a ray of sunshine, that shines through in this article in The Daily Beast about the Aspen Ideas Festival. Written by Lloyd Grove, it recounts that even though “the folks attending this cerebral conclave pairing the Aspen Institute think tank with the Atlantic Monthly magazine might even be seen as President Obama’s natural base,” all is not well.

They are [bites knuckle] questioning Obama’s economic “policy.”

Harvard business and history professor Niall Ferguson offered a withering critique of Obama’s economic policies and was joined by billionaire real estate mogul and New York Daily News owner Mort Zuckerman in lambasting Obama’s trillion-dollar deficit spending program as fiscally ruinous, potentially turning America into a second-rate power.

Zuckerman added that he detects in the Obama White House “hostility to the very kinds of [business] culture that have made this the great country that it is and was. I think we have to find some way of dealing with that or else we will do great damage to this country with a public policy that could ruin everything.”

This was greeted by hearty applause from a crowd that included Barbra Streisand and her husband James Brolin. “Depressing, but fantastic,” Streisand told me afterward, rendering her verdict on the session. “So exciting. Wonderful!” Brolin’s assessment: “Mind-blowing.”

The consensus was similar in an afternoon panel discussion on the decline of the American middle class. “He said jobs were going to be his No. 1 priority - there’s a huge disconnect between Washington and what’s going on out in the country,” nominal Obama supporter Arianna Huffington said. “The president’s economic team kept talking about a ‘cyclical’ problem. Larry Summers said jobs were a lagging economic indicator. All these things are simply wrong. The president put all his trust in the wrong economic team - an economic team that didn’t understand what was happening.”

Doesn’t it appear that some of them are (perhaps, maybe, finally) beginning to get it?

Here’s the link. (the download from the Beast site is slooowww)
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Where are the Blacks?

The left is doing their best to diminish the tea parties by pointing out the lack of black participation. Is that really so difficult to understand?

In the 2008 Presidential election, major exit polls showed between 96% and 97% of African Americans who voted, voted for Obama. Since then, support in the black community has remained strong. A recent New York Times survey found that 96% of blacks still approve of the job that Obama is doing as president. This approval stands in stark contrast to Obama’s approval numbers now at below 50 percent in all major polls.

And if that wasn’t enough, according to the Tax Foundation (www.taxfoundation.org), 41.7 percent of African Americans will file a tax return with no liability. So roughly 42 percent of blacks have little reason to associate themselves with a “Taxed Enough Already” (TEA) movement since they pay no federal income tax.

Duh.

And the final straw is the intense vilification of any person of color who dares to question the liberal “progressive” party line and align themselves with those unclean conservatives – eeewww, gag.

Personally, I’ve never seen or heard any racially disparaging remarks made by those sympathetic to the Tea Party movement against black participation. In fact, any blacks who show the cojones to join with their white brothers and sisters to protest the out-of-control administration in Washington, DC would be welcome with open arms.

To paraphrase Darryl Postell, black folks attending Tea Parties are our people … Americans.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (16) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Here’s the List Post

Well, here it is – finally. After much “rassling” of the data, it is now (I think) correct. As is usually the case when the democrats are involved, the data just didn’t want to be agreeable. I had a difficult time getting multiple lists to agree. When I finally began double-checking the final list, I found three representatives who had voted “NO” on the list. That would be a real disservice, to name someone who voted against that crap sandwich as having voted for it. And I also found two names not on the list who did vote for the bill. My point is, if you pick up another list as a source of who voted for the aberration, you better check it out against a known quality list to be sure that they agree.

I started by using a list that had full names and states, but not districts. That’s the reason for using that list. I then looked up the district for each of the reps. That first list was not wholly accurate, although I didn’t know it at the time – it was a more friendly format for entry into my Excel spreadsheet.

Once the spreadsheet was done, I checked it against two reputable sources, the clerk of house.gov and opencongress.org. That’s when I found the errors. Here are links to those two sources:

This one lists only those democrats voting FOR the bill:
http://www.opencongress.org/roll_call/sublist/6746?party=Democrat&vote=Aye

And this is the one that I consider the definitive one since it’s from the house.gov site, it has all of the “aye” votes together, alphabetically by last name: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll165.xml

Note: although this is the correct url that I used, it wouldn’t work for me Saturday afternoon. UPDATE: It didn’t work Sunday morning, but did work at 7:00 pm on Sunday – don’t know what’s going on there, but the url IS correct. If it doesn’t work for you all I can say is “keep trying.”

If any of you would like the list as a Word attachment, let me have your e-mail address and I’ll send it to you.
 
~~~

Remember in November

My fellow Americans, we have been scammed, tricked, and defrauded by 219 of our so-called elected representatives.

219 individuals that we elected to represent us in Washington, D.C. voted as a conspiracy to take away freedoms, saddle ourselves and our grandchildren with unsustainable debt, and ruin a health care delivery system that was the envy of the world. They are solely responsible for forcing down our collective throats, a “crap sandwich.”

They followed the orders of Speaker Pelosi and accepted Obama’s promises, and voted against the wishes of the American people. They ignored the polls showing that Americans were against passage of the bill. They tuned out our voices and the 219 democrats on this list voted against us, finally passing the bill.

Contrary to promises made by Obama and Pelosi, it was anything but bipartisan – indeed the only bipartisanship was on the “no” side of the vote, which included all 178 Republicans and 34 democrats. The passage of H.R.3590 by (at least) 216 votes, was a cause - a challenge - to the congressional leadership, most notably Speaker Pelosi and Senate Leader Reid – for them, it was a personal crusade, an us-against-them contest. And they won.

While the bill has become known as “Obamacare,” that is really a misnomer. It should be more accurately known as “Demcare.” The congressional democrats are solely responsible for it – they own it, and they will be held accountable for it.

Most of these traitors lined up to vote in favor of the legislation long before the drafting was complete. Their intention was clear, to pass a “healthcare” bill regardless of its cost or whether it was good for the country. They were prepared to do anything to get it passed – damn the Constitution and damn the people – “full steam ahead.”

Our choice is clear. We must replace each of these turncoats. They did not represent us, they represented Pelosi and Reid. They demonstrated the very definition of political arrogance. We will have our opportunity on November 2, 2010 to repay their betrayal.

We will not forget.
 
 

State

District

Representative

 

Arizona

1

Ann Kirkpatrick

 

4

Edward Pastor

 

5

Harry Mitchell

 

7

Raul Grijalva

 

8

Gabrielle Giffords

Arkansas

2

Victor Snyder

California

1

Mike Thompson

 

5

Doris Matsui

 

6

Lynn Woolsey

 

7

George Miller

 

8

Nancy Pelosi

 

9

Barbara Lee

 

10

John Garamendi

 

11

Jerry McNerney

 

12

Jackie Speier

 

13

Fortney Stark

 

14

Anna Eshoo

 

15

Michael Honda

 

16

Zoe Lofgren

 

17

Sam Farr

 

18

Dennis Cardoza

 

20

Jim Costa

 

23

Lois Capps

 

27

Brad Sherman

 

28

Howard Berman

 

29

Adam Schiff

 

30

Henry Waxman

 

31

Xavier Becerra

 

32

Judy Chu

 

33

Diane Watson

 

34

Lucielle Roybal-Allard

 

35

Maxine Waters

 

36

Jane Harman

 

37

Laura Richardson

 

38

Grace Napolitano

 

39

Linda Sanchez

 

43

Joe Baca

 

47

Loretta Sanchez

 

51

Bob Filner

 

53

Susan Davis

Colorado

1

Diana DeGette

 

2

Jared Polis

 

3

John Salazar

 

4

Betsy Markey

 

7

Ed Perlmutter

Connecticut

1

John Larson

2

Joe Courtney

3

Rosa DeLauro

4

James Himes

5

Christopher Murphy

Florida

2

Allen Boyd

3

Corrine Brown

8

Alan Grayson

11

Kathy Castor

17

Kendrick Meek

20

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz

22

Ron Klein

23

Alcee Hastings

24

Suzanne Kosmas

Georgia

2

Sanford Bishop

4

Henry Johnson

5

John Lewis

13

David Scott

Hawaii

2

Mazie Hirono

Illinois

1

Bobby Rush

2

Jesse Jackson

4

Luis Gutierrez

5

Mike Quigley

7

Danny Davis

8

Melissa Bean

9

Janice Schakowsky

11

Deborah Halvorson

12

Jerry Costello

14

Bill Foster

17

Phil Hare

Indiana

1

Peter Visclosky

2

Joe Donnelly

7

Andre Carson

8

Brad Ellsworth

9

Baron Hill

Iowa

1

Bruce Braley

2

David Loebsack

3

Leonard Boswell

Kansas

3

Dennis Moore

Kentucky

3

John Yarmuth

Maine

1

Chellie Pingree

2

Michael Michaud

Maryland

2

C. A. Ruppersberger

3

John Sarbanes

4

Donna Edwards

5

Steny Hoyer

7

Elijah Cummings

8

Christopher Van Hollen

Massachusetts

1

John Oliver

2

Richard Neal

3

James McGovern

4

Barney Frank

5

Niki Tsongas

6

John Tierney

7

Edward Markey

8

Michael Capuano

10

William Delahunt

Michigan

1

Bart Stupak

5

Dale Kildee

7

Mark Schauer

9

Gary Peters

12

Sander Levin

13

Carolyn Kilpatrick

14

John Conyers

15

John Dingell

Minnesota

1

Timothy Walz

4

Betty McCollum

5

Keith Ellison

8

James Oberstar

Mississippi

2

Bennie Thompson

Missouri

1

William Clay

 

3

Russ Carnahan

 

5

Emmanuel Cleaver

Nevada

1

Shelly Berkley

 

3

Dina Titus

New Hampshire

1

Carol Shea-Porter

 

2

Paul Hodes

New Jersey

1

Robert Andrews

 

6

Frank Pallone

 

8

William Pascrell

 

9

Steven Rothman

 

10

Donald Payne

 

12

Rush Holt

 

13

Albio Sires

New Mexico

1

Martin Heinrich

 

3

Ben Lujan

New York

1

Timothy Bishop

 

2

Steve Israel

 

4

Carolyn McCarthy

 

5

Gary Ackerman

 

6

Gregory Meeks

 

7

Joseph Crowley

 

8

Jerrold Nadler

 

9

Anthony Weiner

 

10

Edolphus Towns

 

11

Yvette Clarke

 

12

Nydia Velazquez

 

14

Carolyn Maloney

 

15

Charles Rangel

 

16

Jose Serrano

 

17

Eliot Engel

 

18

Nita Lowey

 

19

John Hall

 

20

Scott Murphy

 

21

Paul Tonko

 

22

Maurice Hinchey

 

23

William Owens

 

25

Daniel Maffei

 

27

Brian Higgins

 

28

Louise Slaughter

North Carolina

1

George Butterfield

 

2

Bob Etheridge

 

4

David Price

 

12

Melvin Watt

 

13

Bradley Miller

North Dakota

0

Earl Pomeroy

Ohio

1

Steve Driehaus

 

6

Charles Wilson

 

9

Marcy Kaptur

 

10

Dennis Kuchinich

 

11

Marcia Fudge

 

13

Betty Sutton

 

15

Mary Jo Kilroy

 

16

John Boccieri

 

17

Timothy Ryan

Oregon

1

David Wu

 

3

Earl Blumenauer

 

4

Peter DeFazio

 

5

Kurt Schrader

Pennsylvania

1

Robert Brady

2

Chaka Fattah

 

3

Kathleen Dahlkemper

 

7

Joe Sestak

 

8

Patrick Murphy

 

10

Christopher Carney

 

11

Paul Kanjorski

 

13

Allyson Schwartz

 

14

Michael Doyle

Rhode Island

1

Patrick Kennedy

 

2

James Langevin

South Carolina

5

John Spratt

 

6

James Clyburn

Tennessee

5

Jim Cooper

 

6

Barton Gordon

 

9

Steve Cohen

Texas

9

Al Green

 

15

Ruben Hinojosa

 

16

Silvestre Reyes

 

18

Sheila Jackson-Lee

 

20

Charles Gonzalez

 

23

Ciro Rodriguez

 

25

Lloyd Doggett

 

27

Solomon Ortiz

 

28

Henry Cuellar

 

29

Raymond Green

 

30

Eddie Bernice Johnson

Vermont

0

Peter Welch

Virginia

3

Robert Scott

 

5

Tom Perriello

 

8

James Moran

 

11

Gerald Connolly

Washington

1

Jay Inslee

 

2

Rick Larsen

 

3

Brian Baird

 

6

Norman Dic

 

7

James McDermott

9

Adam Smith

West Virginia

1

Alan Mollohan

3

Nick Rahall

Wisconsin

2

Tammy Baldwin

 

3

Ronald Kind

 

4

Gwen Moore

 

7

David Obey

 

8

Steve Kagen

 

 
 
UPDATE: Townhall's wonderful editor prevents me from including the representative's full last name for Washington's 6th district cause it is deemed "inappropriate." It should end in "ks." I've been complaining about the problem for almost two years - bad enough it doesn't allow proper names, but doesn't flush the error after it is fixed. Thanks Townhall.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Proposal for our Conservative Blogger Community

     A Proposal for our Conservative Blogger Community
 
I hereby commit to publishing at least one post each and every month between now and the November 2, 2010 mid-term election that will name every Representative and every Senator who voted FOR the Obamacare healthcare bill. I don’t care whether they subsequently resign or retire, their shame should follow them forever.

I’ll post the names here on Pesky Truth here at Townhall as well as my other blogs on WordPress and Blogspot. I will also send e-mails to each of my friends and family members notifying of them of my latest posts. Like all bloggers, I aspire to a larger readership, but lacking that, I’ll keep reminding everyone within my reach.

If each of us does the same, we can remind everyone of those individuals who spat in the face of American citizens and make sure that voters don’t forget who they are. They are betting that our memories will gradually fade and we’ll forget how incensed we are right now. I intend to do all that I can to prevent that from happening.

I’ll take the responsibility to gather the names and format them into an attachment that will allow an easy e-mail distribution to all who want to participate. It should be easy for you to simply cut/paste the contents of the attachment into a post on your blog and publish it – obviously, along with any editorial content that you might want to add. We can coordinate when we publish between us so we don’t all do it on the same date. We want to remind all of those within our circles that the named congresspersons intentionally chose to ignore the Constitution and cast their vote against the best interests of the country’s citizens.

I fully realize that our meager efforts may only be a drop in the bucket, but if we can assure a few hundred (hopefully thousands) of additional votes against these traitors in November, it will have been worth it.

Let me know of your thoughts.

Garnet92
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You Can Vote but You Can’t Hide

Note to Congress: We’re watching You.

Like never before, millions of citizens are watching the actions in play in Washington, D.C. and to put it mildly, we are not happy.

All polls show that the citizenry is against passage of the current skulduggery commonly called the “healthcare” bill. It’s obvious that you think that we’re all idiots and can’t possibly understand that the legislation will be “good for us.” If it’s so good, why aren’t you folks part of it? Truth be told, it is smoke and mirrors, pure and simple.

You think we don’t understand it – you’re wrong. We understand much more than you suspect and we don’t want it, we can’t afford it – and we especially don’t want it shoved down our collective throats via arcane parliamentary maneuvers. You’re going to “deem” it passed? Give me a break, you’re all afraid of a direct vote on a final “finished” bill. You are cowards.

You think that we’ll forget – you’re wrong again. It’s less than eight months till mid-term elections – we will not forget. Hundreds of thousands of conservative activists and bloggers will not allow the voting public to forget.

You think that Speaker Pelosi and/or Senate Leader Reid will give you some cover or promise some cushy appointment when you lose your job (and you will). Wrong again. You had better have a fall-back gig, because you’re about to lose your “day job.” You might want to be practicing a “want fries with that?” sales pitch.

The democrat majority has badly misread the American public. You’ve been too insulated from the real world and apparently believe that we the people really want this travesty of legislation that will not reduce individual healthcare costs, will add to the country’s deficit, and tramples on citizen’s constitutional rights. This is parliamentary rape of the American people and all for partisan political purposes.
 
You say that the bill will save $500 billion in waste, fraud, and abuse, yet that same "waste, fraud, and abuse savings" appears in every new bill proposed - and it never happens. Then the bill includes $200 billion in cuts in Medicare reimbursements to doctors - that you know must be rescinded or risk doctors dropping all Medicare patients. It'll be rescinded in a separate bill - to hide it. These supposed "savings" are not real. These two items alone account for $700 billion worth of fraudulent "savings," - you know it, and we know it.

In order to believe the president and congressional leader’s description of the positive results that will accrue to the country if the bill passes requires the willing suspension of disbelief. They (and you) are lying to the American people, you know you are, and we know you are.

You can’t hide from your vote. Even without a direct vote, we’ll know who was party to passing this fraudulent legislation and you will be held accountable.

If you vote for this chicanery (look it up), your name will forever be associated with the intentional subversion of the United States and our Constitution, and we will not forget.
 
We will never forget.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Congressional Chicanery

I’m formally proposing that henceforth, a class picture of the 111th Congress be displayed as part of the references for “chicanery” in all dictionaries and encyclopedias. They are indeed, the very illustration of the word.

Even though most democrats are doing their best to ignore the congressional skullduggery currently underway, we have an opportunity to educate them on a descriptive noun that accurately describes what Speaker Pelosi, Senate Leader Reid and the democrat majorities are doing.

One simple word can paint the mental picture that truly describes the activities of this Congress. And that word is … chicanery … here is a definition:

chi·can·er·y

–noun, plural-er·ies.

1. Trickery or deception used to trick, deceive, or evade

Some synonyms: cheating, deviousness, dishonesty, double-crossing, double-dealing, fraud, hanky-panky, plot, ploy, ruse, skullduggery, subterfuge, surreptitiousness, underhandedness.

It was bad enough when they played dishonest games with the original healthcare bill by specifying that ten years of revenue would be included, but only six years of expenses. This was done to artificially reduce the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) estimate of the bill’s cost over the required ten year projection. They said that the House bill (based on the input given the CBO) would increase the deficit by $239 billion over 10 years. But what would that number be if there were an additional four years of expenses added in? How much more would the deficit be increased with four more years of expenses? Even a farm animal could reason that if the forecast was based on the same period for revenue and expenses, the cost would be substantially higher. Ten years of revenue and only six years of expenses does not yield a true 10-year cost of the legislation. That is dishonest and is meant to deceive us, the taxpayers – and that is - congressional chicanery.

Then, in order to stop a scheduled 21% reduction in Medicare payments to doctors, they moved the legislation designed to “fix” the doctor’s reduction (by rescinding it, it’s called the “doctor fix”) to an entirely separate, unrelated bill. This was done to keep the $210 billion dollar fix out of the healthcare bill because it would have added another $210 billion to the cost of the bill. The “Doctor Fix” was moved to what is referred to as the “Jobs Bill” to keep the cost of the healthcare insurance reform bill under that “magic” $1 trillion figure. That is slight-of-hand and fraud, and even more congressional chicanery.

Those are only two egregious examples, there are countless more.

So, we’re not being told the truth about the real cost of the proposed healthcare overhaul and Congress is intentionally lying to us, they know that they must, else we’d never allow the legislation to pass.

The legislation is bad enough. But an even more troublesome activity is the methodology that they’re using to force the bill into law. There will be no single bill, negotiated by conference committee, on which to vote as is usually the case. There will be no “up or down” vote as we, the taxpayers, might expect. Indeed, there may not even be a vote on a “final” bill at all. Instead, Speaker Pelosi and her thugs are proposing that they just “deem” the bill to have been passed because the House passed a bill (bill “A”) and the Senate passed a different bill (bill “B”) – they say that each body did indeed pass a bill.

This action would (supposedly) allow Obama to sign the bill into law although legislators are not on record as having voted for it (they voted for that “other” bill). This way they could deny having voted for this travesty. Yet another case of deviousness, dishonesty, and double-crossing of we the people.

They are scrambling now, beating the bushes to find any way to get the bill passed – regardless of the method. Apparently, they will do anything to pass healthcare now.

This Congress is spitting in the face of we the people. They are acting in their own interest – not ours. They are pulling every dirty, underhanded trick to “fool” us into believing that our healthcare will be improved, it will cost individuals less, it will not increase the deficit, and everyone will happy that they forced it down our throats.

In any other endeavor, their actions would be deemed (there’s that word again) fraudulent and subject to prosecution – but no … “they’re just our ‘public servants,’ doing their duty.”

That’s a load of B.S.

They cannot be allowed to pursue these devious, dishonest, double-crossing, double-dealing, fraudulent activities without consequences.

We all aspire to leave our children and grandchildren a better life. We want them to be happy and safe, emotionally and economically sound, and free to follow their dreams, whatever they may be.

If we allow this congressional chicanery to continue – to go unpunished, we will have failed all of those who follow us and they will reap the whirlwind.

Somewhere, Osama bin Laden is laughing. He is watching our own “representatives” do to the United States what he only wishes he could do – bring her down.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It’s Plain as the Ears on Obama’s Head

It’s Plain as the Ears on Obama’s Head

We are vindicated.

Those of us who warned of Obama’s lack of executive experience have been vindicated. It has become painfully apparent that he is in way over his head. Even with his “superior” intelligence (his flock calls it genius), and surrounding himself with multitudes of “experts” in every discipline imaginable, he has been unable to accomplish anything of substance. Even aided and abetted by Democrat majorities in both the House and Senate, and a blindly supportive media, his success in fixing the country’s problems has been virtually nonexistent. Indeed, he has caused or exacerbated many of our current woes.

His follower’s blind faith automatically transmuted his charismatic appearances and inspiring rhetoric into misplaced confidence that he could produce tangible results. He didn’t need any of that pesky experience and stuff, he was Obama the Magnificent, and he could overcome any obstacle that might deter an ordinary mortal. But, campaigning is not governing and he’s finding it difficult to leverage his one strength – evangelical sermons read from a teleprompter, into genuine leadership.

“In a campaign, you’re not held to the same standard of actually doing what you say you’re going to do,” said Anita Dunn, a former White House communications director and Obama campaign adviser. No kidding? In other words, he never expected to be held accountable for the statements and promises made during the campaign, it was all to influence uninformed voters.

Now, at least once a month, he announces a new policy that (coincidently) looks very much like one implemented by that “imbecilic spawn of Satan” himself, George Bush. Of course, his staff will add a little camouflage so that the policy won’t be immediately recognizable as a Bush policy – at least not by Obama’s congregation. Obama’s people will proclaim it to be a carefully considered, thoughtfully nuanced solution to a difficult and complex issue. But beneath it all, Bush’s fingerprints remain.

Obama’s ego won’t allow him to admit that he is unqualified to handle the job of POTUS. His narcissism requires worship and adoration to fuel his ego, so it’s impossible for him to consciously accept that he is using Bush’s leftovers to fix some of his most challenging problems. His approach is that of an academic: loads of studies, charts, obscure references, and Powerpoint presentations – lots of talk, reams of paper, but no real substantive action. Truth be told; he’s never been held accountable for anything. If there’s any doubt, check on his accomplishments as a community organizer (dismal). Look at his successes as an attorney (never tried a case) and a State Senator (without Emil Jones, he did nothing). And don’t forget the barely two years he spent as a U.S. Senator before announcing for President, during which he sponsored two (2) bills that became law (both inconsequential). As has been said by many, whenever Obama walks into a room, he is almost certainly the least qualified person in the room. Yet, here he is, our President.

The economy is in shambles, and while Bush 43 contributed mightily to that problem, Obama has doubled-down on Bush’s errors and raised the ante. He pushes “Obamacare” while jobs and the economy are more serious and pressing problems. Except for Obama’s omnipresent straw man (known as “there are those who say”), everyone else agrees that health care needs to be fixed. But, is health care more pressing than an unemployment rate hovering around ten percent? Or more important than helping the 14.9  million now out of work find gainful employment? (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Mar. 5, 2010).

The labor market is now roughly 12 million jobs below what would be needed to return to the pre-recession level of unemployment (Economic Policy Institute, Mar. 5, 2010). But didn’t Obama promise that 3.5 million jobs would be created (or “saved”) when the $787 billion dollar stimulus bill passed? And wasn’t the unemployment rate going to top out at 8 percent?

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the 2010 deficit will be 1.5 trillion ($1,500,000,000,000) with an unemployment rate estimated to average 10.1 percent for the year. And the 10-year outlook released by the CBO now estimates that President Obama's proposed budget would add more than $9.7 trillion to the national debt over the next decade - fully $1.2 trillion more than the White House had projected.

Based entirely on his record – his history of results - why would anyone believe anything he now says? His record is abysmal, nothing he’s forecast or promised has come to pass. He has simply been wrong at every turn. Yet, Obama’s efforts are single-mindedly devoted to passing a healthcare bill that Americans don’t want and can’t afford.

Obama and the “progressives” are in full “shopaholic” mode. They’ve seen it, they want it, and damn the cost - they’ve just got to have it.

Thankfully, most Americans are finally waking up. Rasmussen’s latest poll (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)shows Obama’s overall approval plunging. Only Forty-three percent (43%) of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President’s performance while Fifty-six percent (56%) disapprove. It took George Bush almost six years to get to this level of job approval, Obama’s managed it in 14 months. I guess that it could be said that he finally bested Bush at something.
 
Don't forget to check out We're Watching You for new developments ... coming.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (20) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Pesky Truth Gazette, Volume 2, Number: Ocho Cinco [Satire]

 

The Pesky Truth Gazette 

"Today’s news, just a splat or two after it hits the fan®."

Volume: 2, Number: Ocho Cinco

In the spirit of transparency (made so popular by Congress and the Obama administration), we at Pesky Truth feel compelled to expose ourselves. We will fling open the figurative raincoat of concealment to reveal that we have moles.

 

Our moles are the human covert-operator kind, not the furry kind related to shrews (shrew meaning Suncus murinus, not to be confused with Nancy Pelosi). They occupy trusted positions in Congress and the White House and are able to feed PT real insider information not available to the usual news sources. Our moles stay underground, out of the public eye. You won’t recognize a name; they are nameless. You wouldn’t recognize a face; they are faceless. In fact, we have a tough time finding them ourselves. But rest assured, they are there, digging deep for the true stories.

 

You won’t see the following articles in any other blog or news source, they are exclusive to Pesky Truth.
 

Obama slightly ill, reportedly has a global-warming induced fever.


This real story is being kept under wraps by Obama’s Czar of Spin and Dry.

A group of clinical psychologists, consulting with prominent psychiatrists, is treating the president for what is called a “minor disorder.” Rather than a mild fever, insiders tell PT that he has developed a facial tic on the left side of his Holy Countenance and a pronounced lean to the left when standing or walking. The result of the lean causes Obama to walk in counter clockwise ovals if not otherwise redirected.
 
A source tells us that he is also experiencing occasions of extreme anger. Recently, he kicked his teleprompter (TOTUS), which promptly retaliated by falling on the president’s left knee, cracking the kneecap. Of course, he blamed the George Bush for turning TOTUS against him and angrily directed the IRS to investigate TOTUS for tax irregularities.
 
A preliminary diagnosis attributes the president’s erratic actions to a form of Waking Up to Fact syndrome (or, WTF). It is thought that the president’s record of failures during his first year as POTUS, has brutally awakened him and caused him to question his Messiahness.
 
He really thought that his transcendent powers of persuasion would allow him to convince North Korea and Iran to mend their ways. He should have been able to win the Olympic games for Chicago, and being snubbed by China at the Copenhagen climate summit just was too much and pushed him over the edge.
 
Circumstances have forced him to doubt himself – to confront reality. Where is his Cap and Trade bill, where is his healthcare, his amnesty, his Academy Award, his ascension to the throne of world leader? Why are his poll numbers down? Why is Tiger Woods scoring more than he?
 
He’s been heard to say, “What’s wrong with these people? Don’t they know who I am? How can they doubt me? I am he who AM. He who IS is me. I am who we has been waiting for, is I not? ”
 
Bystanders said he continued to mumble and “speak in tongues,” continuing an incoherent tirade for hours, all the while limping around in ovals.
 

As Yoda would say, “Blew a gasket, he did.”

~~~
 
Showing Gitmo immigrants some love.
 
Pesky Truth has learned of a new project undertaken by Conservative tea party groups. They’re proposing that taxpayers fund tours of Obama’s Chicago home by groups of Gitmo “transferees.”
 
The proposed tour would begin with a period of unescorted contemplation time reserved for the transferee’s religious reflection. It would allow time for the Gitmoians to improvise empathy rather than harbor explosive anger if left to their own devices. An environment of trust would be nurtured by allowing the transferees to free run inside the Obama homestead. That could help to convince them that we like them, we really, really like them and mean them no harm. This would further gain their respect.
 
The tea party groups also recommended that the tours be scheduled when Obama is present in the mansion to allow those misguided Gitmoians an opportunity to bask in the aura of Himness that permeates the mansion when His Presence is present. Perhaps they’d even stumble across the Dear Leader himself and have an opportunity to bond with him while showing him appreciation for their newfound freedom.
 
When asked for an opinion, transferee Abdul Mohammed Swartz stated that he’d ask president Obanma to autograph his newly written books “Whittling With a Boxcutter” and “Jihad for fun and profit.”
 
~~~
 
“Smart” meters will reduce our energy usage.
 
A new report by Blabbin’ Joe Biden projects that the number of U.S. homes with smart meters will jump from about 8 million now to 40 million by 2015. Smart meters, huh? Call us conspiracy nuts, but we’ll guarantee that the new smart meters will have the capability to limit energy usage based on a government-mandated profile. We’re told that they’ll be called the Federal Usage Guidelines (or, FUG).
 
The FUGing plan calls for a limited number of standard profiles, each of which specifies how much energy may be used. Already accusations are flying. The Heritage Foundation has secured hundreds of e-mails between parties involved in producing the profiles. They’re said to show that the democrats are FUGmandering the profiles (an energy equivalent of gerrymandering). Heritage has found that historically democrat voting districts are given profiles allowing 20% more energy than Republican controlled districts and global warming proponents (like Al Gore) have been assigned profiles with no limit.
 
The profiles limit real-time energy usage. In other words, you can either bake something in an oven or you can fire up a pottery kiln - but not both. On a hot summer day, you could either run your air conditioning or cook dinner – but not both. In any case where your selection of an energy-using device exceeds your allotment, the system would FUG it, cancelling your selection. Either abide by your allotment or you’d get FUGged. We should all be prepared to get FUGged.
 
~~~
 
Introducing a new commodities market.
 
Here’s another concept that’s being shopped in Congress. It’s based on the Federal Usage Guidelines (FUG) program. The government would create and regulate a new commodity market trading in FUG credits. Since the FUG energy allotments couldn’t discriminate, po-folks would get as much allotment as rich folks and be able to sell unused FUG up-credits to wealthy folks, thereby allowing the rich to exceed their assigned limit and at the same time, become a source of revenue to the maladvantaged.
 
Rep. Bawney Fwank is the principal sponsor of this concept. He believes that it could solve the redistribution of wealth and energy problems in one swell foop. And who knows swell foops better than the man voted “Swell Foop of the Year?
 
~~~
 
Obama’s New Czar of Adjustments.
 
In a surprise move, president Obama named Bernard Madoff to be his new Czar of Adjustments. The infamous entrepreneur, judged to be a genius with numbers, was tasked with developing corrective adjustment factors to correct administration score numbers for various kinds of biases. Madoff earned his M.A. (Master of Adjustments) from the University of East Anglia in the UK. He is well versed in “adjusting” raw data as evidenced by his Madoff Investment Securities success.
 
With his conviction now expunged by an Obama Executive Order, he is free to apply his talents to helping the administration correct some erroneous information previously reported by the media. He’ll be working alongside Andy Fastow, former CFO of Enron to develop adjustments to correct various financial inaccuracies.
 
For example, the administration had been touting the creation of 640,000 jobs. After applying a Madoff/Fastow factor to the jobs figure, the administration now has corrected that number to be 4,440,017 jobs created. And it comes as no surprise that the unemployment rate previously misreported as 10 percent, has now been corrected to 2.7 percent.
 
In other corrections, president Obama was giddy to inform citizens that our national debt was only $110.1 billion dollars, rather than exceeding $12 trillion as had been estimated, and his new health plan would actually make a $97 million profit, rather than cost over a trillion dollars. And as a result, when adjustments were applied to the president’s approval rating, it soared to 99.2%, up from a dismal 47%.
 
What GREAT news. The recession is gone, jobs are plentiful, the president is popular, and the economy is booming. The country is finally on the right track after shaking off the shackles imposed by that pesky Bush administration. And we have Obama and Madoff and Fastow (oh my) to thank for it.
 
Finally, Obama lives up to his promise of truth and transparency and gives us numbers we can count on. I forget - how is czarchasm spelt?
 
~~~
 
Obama’s Energy Task Force – smartest guys on the planet? Or really confused?
 
PK is investigating a report that Obama’s Energy Task Force is contracting with a group of Gitmo transferees to manufacture products for which they have been trained and with which they are very knowledgeable – IEDs. The contract is seen as a way to help the poor, misunderstood souls gain a measure of self-respect by helping them leverage their previous training into a productive trade.
 
However, there is a concern.
 
Obama’s experts have based the contract on the understanding that “IED” stands for Improved Energy Device. The Gitmoians pooh poohed (or should that be wee wee'd?) the interpretation (voiced by some) that IED was short for “Improvised Explosive Device” and convinced the task force that the “explosive” interpretation was discriminatory against Jihadists.
 
The new energy generators were developed by the detainees while attending career improvement workshops in Guantanamo. The IEDs are said to use entirely new secret technology to produce enough electricity to power an average-sized 2,000 sq. ft. home.

The Gitmoian's goal is to place the new state-of-the-art energy generators in all Chicago homes by December 25th, 2010, just in time for Christmas. A spokesman for the transferee group, Abdul
Salami Al-dente, explained that his craftsman were so expert that each device carried a lifetime warranty. “When the time comes, the devices will do their job without fail, you will see – no one will say a bad word – not one will be returned.”
 
Obama’s IED Czar, Ali Rashidi Al-agory, expressed his confidence that the Chicago homes containing the devices will no longer have any energy worries when the IEDs go online at midnight, Christmas Eve. "We will light up Chicago," he said gleefully.
 
When the president learned of the project, he turned a ghastly shade of mocha and wasted no time immediately hauling his two-toned derrière back to Washington. He expressed his regrets that he couldn’t be present for the lighting up of Chicago by the “Jihadists w Chicago” project.
 

~~~

 

You bet your income, a new congressional game.

 

A spokesperson for We’re Watching You, a Conservative think tank, has proposed a new way to assure congress’ veracity when writing or voting on legislation.
 
Once enacted, the law would require each member of the House and Senate to “wager” a percentage of their income on the accuracy of selected statements describing the law (being voted on) and its effects on several major categories of governance, like: budget, deficit, its adherence to the constitution, etc. The congressperson would be attesting to his/her understanding of each specified point (they’d have to start reading bills), their assurance that each point was Constitutional (they’d have to start reading the Constitution), and that it would improve related aspects of life for the citizens of the U.S. (they’d have to start considering the citizens and taxpayers).
 
Each congressperson would be graded by federal grand juries (in secret session, according to facts and evidence) as to whether their answers to the questions were accurate. If accurate, they’d be eligible for a “Truth Bonus.” If their answers are found to be wrong or misleading, they’d have their income reduced by the wagered percentage. The seized funds would be applied to deficit reduction.
 
For example, let’s suppose that Representative Freemeal Nada (D,CA) is presented with the following questions:
 

Do you firmly believe and voluntarily legally attest:

 

·        That the Obamacare bill will NOT add to the deficit?

·        That healthcare costs will NOT rise for ordinary citizens?

·        That the Obamacare bill will NOT cause rationing of health care, whether by design or as an unintended consequence?

·        That patient care will be improved?

·        That illegal aliens will NOT be covered?
 
Those are just a few examples of the questions that could be put to our “representatives.”
 
Let’s suppose that Representative Nada is tempted to vote on the Obamacare bill without reading it. If he wants to protect his standard of living, he must read the bill so he knows what it actually specifies, and he not likely to wager a high percentage of confidence on a “Yes” answer, agreeing to those questions when he knows the answer is certain to be “No.” To protect his livelihood, he MUST answer “No” with a high degree of confidence (a high wager percentage). Truthful answers to probing questions will result in a bonus for Rep. Nada.
 
Each time Rep. Nada votes on a bill, he has the opportunity to receive a bonus – or – to have a percentage of his income appropriated. How do you think he’ll vote?
 
Pesky Truth believes that this concept could fundamentally change the way congress works. No longer would it be in their interest to lie, hide, bribe and obfuscate, the concept will require a “refresh” of congress. Most of our current incumbents would quickly end up on welfare since honesty is such a foreign concept to them. But, they’d be replaced with honest individuals of character. We could then begin to resurrect a confidence that we once had in our legislative branch.
 
Problem solved. The pesky truth wins again.
 
~~~
 
To our readers: please visit www.werewatchingyou.net and help us dump the trash from congress. We have volunteers who are offering the temporary use of their septic tanks to accept the waste so that we won't soil dumpsters with them.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pesky Congressional Scheme No. 454 [Satire?]

Pesky Truth has learned of the most insidious scheme ever perpetrated by our congressional representatives on an unsuspecting electorate.

We, the voters, will be relieved of the pesky chore of casting ballots. We have become superfluous (that means “unnecessary” for Obama voters). There is a plan afoot to remove the election process from the capricious whims of the voters and place it in the more qualified hands of congress itself.

Here’s what our sources tell us: using software modeling techniques developed at the University of East Anglia in Norwich, UK and working from decades of raw voting data going back to the 18th century, the newly-formed Voter Research Unit (VRU) will apply “adjustments” to previous voting patterns to yield new voting trends. Based on those trends, turnout and results may now be scientifically forecast.

Pesky Truth has learned that Congress has already secured a license to use the university’s Climate Research Unit (CRU) software to determine what the “proper” election results should be for any given election. The university will first clean the code, removing any pesky remarks and revising the hard-coded adjustment factors to adhere to the stringent requirements defined by the VRU.

We can expect each incumbent’s vote total to appear as a upward spike in his/her votes, not unlike the “hockey stick” pattern shown in the infamous Global-Scale Temperature Patterns graph. Based on an amalgam of historical vote totals and proxy “votes” estimated from tree sap and animal droppings, the VRU can now forecast election results with great accuracy.

In fact, we’re told that the VRU has already beta-tested the 2010 midterm congressional elections and the 2012 presidential election and forecast that democrats will win all 435 house seats, all 100 senate seats, and the presidency.

Congress has already begun work drafting legislation to redirect the funding previously wasted on elections. The new software will assist the VRU in forecasting who would have run against the democrat candidate and since they will lose, tax them for the money that they would have spent on their campaign. Contributors to those ill-fated campaigns will be forecast and taxed for the amount they would have contributed. Just today, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has added a new stipulation to the legislation. One that denies any recourse to any individual who maintains that he/she would not have run for office, or that he/she would not have contributed to any campaign. Once identified by the VRU software, the individual loses any right of denial.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated the new revenue at 2.8 trillion dollars over ten years. Or, enough cash to fund a comfortable lifestyle for each and every member of congress - one that they believe they so richly deserve.

After all, it’s hard work defrauding the public.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (17) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A FAILED PRESIDENCY

An article from American Thinker by Geoffrey P. Hunt

Barack Obama is on track to have the most spectacularly failed presidency since Woodrow Wilson. 
 
Barack Obama is failing.  Failing big.  Failing fast.  And failing everywhere: foreign policy, domestic initiatives, and most importantly, in forging connections with the American people. 
 
Expect Obama to lament at his last press conference in 2012: "For those of you I offended, I apologize.  For those of you who were not offended, you just didn't give me enough time; if only I'd had a second term, I could have offended you too."
 
Those are just a few exerpts from the article - it's a worthwhile read. Read the whole thing at:
 
Thanx to my friend, Rock for this one!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Says “Wait for the Facts”

Really? The only facts we’re still waiting for is the mix of how many were killed and how many are still hospitalized.

The fact is: Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim, killed at least twelve of our soldiers and wounded approximately thirty more. He was reportedly upset at being deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan.

He was a psychiatrist, he wouldn’t have been on the front lines. Most likely, he’d be in a protected area and safe from harm – unlike those that he cowardly attacked.

I can’t begin to tell you how it breaks my heart to have countless spouses, moms, dads, sisters and brothers all agonizing over how this could happen to those they loved, on U.S. soil, on a military base. Preparing to voluntarily go into hostile territory to keep America safe is the true definition of a hero. They were all heroes. God grant them all the Glories of Heaven, they paid the ultimate price for being soldiers.

And I didn’t forget the children of those soldiers, those affect me the most. I don’t dare dwell on how their lives will be affected by taking away their mom or dad. I’m not a crying kind of guy, but if I dwell on that thought too long, I’ll tear up – I know I will. My heart aches for those babies, toddlers, kids, and young men and women who have had their caregiver, their protector, their mentor, their coach, their teacher, and the person who above all, would love them without reservation, snatched from their lives. Can anyone ever lose more?

Though many murders can be described as “senseless,” this event can’t be described otherwise. These soldiers did nothing to Nidal Malik Hasan, they didn’t threaten him or his family. It’s unlikely they even knew him. They were simply going about their business, preparing to leave their families and go into harm’s way – to protect Nidal Malik Hasan and his American countrymen. And for this, he murdered them.

Obama and the pro-Muslim forces will try to put a smiley-face on this atrocity. They’ll sweep aside the fact that Nidal Malik Hasan was a Muslim and tell us that it wasn’t a hate crime … the victims weren't murdered, they were merely issued “Involuntary Deployments into Permanent Inactivity.”

And lest we forget, the Police Sergeant Kimberly Munley, who shot Nidal Malik Hasan and stopped any additional killing. She certainly deserves hero status. Especially when we apply Obama’s statistical methodology used to calculate “saved jobs.” Press Secretary Gibbs will probably tell us that Sergeant Munley likely saved several thousand innocent victims from senseless slaughter by her heroic actions.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (13) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WWY – Questions & Answers

WWY – Questions & Answers

The “We’re Watching You” project is now operational within Townhall. We wanted to shake out the bugs before a sympathetic audience before going out to the general public. Bloggers and those leaving comments have asked a number of questions that deserve answers. Here are the questions raised so far:

Things are tough, what if I can’t afford to contribute cash?

Don’t let that stop you, we still need your support. There are no charges involved in sending the letters, except for stamps. This is another opportunity to gather together with other like-minded conservatives and make our voices heard – and it won’t cost you a dime to e-mail the letters.

I’m busy, how long does it take to send ten e-mails or print and mail ten letters?

Based on actual timings, one can send nine e-mails (one, Representative Kilroy, doesn’t provide an e-mail address) and print hers for postal mailing in no more than 15 minutes – not counting actually mailing her letter. That includes downloading all ten, inserting a name and address into each one and saving the letter. Then e-mailing one-at-a-time, cutting and pasting the letter into the body of the e-mail. Using USPS to mail the letters may take an additional 5 or 10 minutes to address and stamp all ten envelopes. Isn’t that a worthwhile tradeoff? Fifteen to thirty minutes to take an action that could help to prevent Pelosicare, cap and trade, etc.?

NOTE: Ideally, we’d intended to be able to automatically send ten e-mails with a single button depression on the WWY website, but the GoDaddy software won’t support that automation. If anyone can volunteer to assist with automating that operation, we would be forever grateful. If you’ve got technical abilities that could help or some other software that could be fed from GoDaddy, please let Bobbie know.

There are other House members that deserve to be replaced, why isn’t [named rep] included?

We fully recognize that many other representatives deserve to be replaced – including many Republicans. This project is beginning with a small first step - a manageable number. Imagine how daunting a list of 80 or 100 would be? For one thing, we’d still be accumulating information in preparation for initial publishing. By targeting the ten most vulnerable, we can proceed quickly in a controlled manner to have an impact. We already have the necessary information on another 35 or 40 to add additional groups as we begin to make inroads. There will be more.

Why are these targeted ten only Democrats, certainly there are Republicans that should be removed?

We agree. However, the thrust of this project is to reduce the Democrat majority in the House. Perhaps we can help to regain control of the House on November 2, 2010. Replacing a Republican doesn’t reduce Pelosi’s majority, and she can still ram legislation down our throats. We can concentrate on improving the Republican members after we regain control of the House from the Democrats.

If the letter isn’t from a representative’s constituent, won’t they just discard it and ignore any comment?

We are anticipating that they will do just that. However, when the number of letters becomes noticeable (maybe 50, 100, or more), the staff opening the letters will have seen the WWY coordinated letters and will be aware of the number of out-of-district respondents that are threatening to support the representative’s opponent. That’s all we’re after, to plant a seed that we believe will grow into influence.

After recognizing that WWY members are e-mailing the same (or similar edited) letters, wouldn’t staff try to block the letters as “spam”?

This is another advantage of sending the e-mails one-by-one instead of via an automated mechanism. They are sent from the sender’s e-mail address, all of which are different. If they were sent from a single address (as would probably be the case in an automated system), that address would be susceptible to blocking.

Can I change the letter(s)? I’d like to add a few well chosen comments.

Of course, you can edit it after saving it to your computer and before printing it or sending it out. We ask that you remember that any profanity or inappropriate comments would reflect badly on the entire WWY project and therefore ask that you keep it clean, concise, and relevant.

Exactly how much influence can our letters be expected to have on a sitting member of the U.S. House?

Letters from non-constituents ordinarily wouldn’t carry much (if any) weight with a representative. But, as noted before, numbers can make the difference. If our WWY letters show up daily, perhaps several a day, doesn’t it follow that notice will be taken? And remember that our letters are threatening to support the rep’s opponent. I know that I’d notice and tell the rep, wouldn’t you?

Let’s be realistic, our letters by themselves won’t work any miracles. But taken in combination with other activities like the tea parties, town hall meetings, the DC protest and the NJ and VA governor wins, we can help the representative become more aware of their vulnerability and think twice about automatically voting with Nancy Pelosi.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Challenge to TH Bloggers

A Challenge to TH Bloggers

This is an honest-to-goodness, in-your-face challenge to all of you who blog about the Obama, Pelosi and Reid’s dismantling of the U.S.A.

It’s all been said before; our government is no longer by or for “the people.” Under the current administration, it is for the liberals, the unions, and the special interests.

We’ve all blogged about the obfuscation, the “behind closed doors” deals, and the out and out lying that is apparent daily in Washington. We‘ve railed against the massive bills that are passed without being read. And we know that the Democrat majorities in the House and Senate allow them to pass legislation that goes against the wishes of the majority of the country’s citizens and, worse yet, violate the spirit and letter of the U.S. Constitution.

For the most part, our blogs are preaching to the choir. Have we made a difference? Have we changed anyone’s mind?

Unfortunately, the answer to both questions is probably “no.”

Recently, a small band of TH bloggers determined to make a difference. We formed the “We’re Watching You” group and we have developed a plan that really could impact the 2010 elections. Familiar names contributed to the project: Bobbie, dawndawn, The Adjuster, glnflwrs, Gray Ghost and Garnet92. We’ve also received encouragement and behind-the-scenes help from many other TH friends.

The concept is this: reduce the Democrat majority in the House by replacing some of its most vulnerable members. We’ve selected the ten most susceptible and will work to: 1) convince them that they are being monitored and they must not blindly follow Nancy Pelosi’s lead or we will work to replace them, and 2) we will encourage campaign contributions to their opponents to improve the chances that the incumbents will be replaced.

We believe this may be the quickest and most effective way to slow (or stop) the wholesale dismantling of America.

And before some suggest that there are also Republicans that should be replaced, we recognize that, but replacing a Specter/Snowe RINO with Ronald Reagan himself wouldn’t change the Democrat’s majority – they’d still control the House. Overturning the Democrat’s majority must be the first priority, we’ll get to the RINOs later.

Now, the choice is yours. You can create a new blog post complaining about the sorry state of current affairs – OR – you can join with us and actually DO something to take the country back.

Take those twenty or thirty minutes you would have spent on writing one new blog post and instead use that time to send ten letters to the selected House Democrats informing them that “We’re Watching You.” If we can influence some of these ten House members, we can begin to put the brakes on runaway spending and enactment of laws that we neither need or want.

This is an opportunity for you to step up and do more than complain. Go to our website www.werewatchingyou.net and check it out – see if you agree with us. If you do, download the letters and mail, fax, or e-mail them to the Democrat incumbents. THEN, you can sit back and revel in the knowledge that you have taken the first step to actually take this country back. Sending those letters will cost you nothing except a few minutes of your time.

It’s time to quit talking and actually DO SOMETHING.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (35) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive